← All questions

difference between riddhi and siddhi

Aug 30, 2026

In Jainism, Riddhi (ऋद्धि) and Siddhi (सिद्धि) are distinct concepts. Riddhi refers to wealth, prosperity, or supernatural accomplishments and powers. The Sthananga Sutra classifies Riddhi into three main types: Dev-riddhi (divine wealth, such as celestial vehicles, transmutation powers, and divine retinues), Rajya-riddhi (state wealth, including royal decorations, armies, treasuries, and granaries), and Gani-riddhi (a preceptor's wealth, such as scriptural knowledge, eloquent disciples, and unblemished conduct) [1][3]. These are further subdivided into living (sachitta), non-living (achitta), and mixed (mishra) categories [1][3].

Siddhi, on the other hand, refers to liberation or the abode of liberated souls (Siddhas). It is described in the Bhagavati Sutra as having four aspects: Dravyasiddhi (substance—one Siddha with a limit), Kshetrasiddhi (area—4.5 million Yojans in length and width, with a limit), Kaalsiddhi (time—eternal, without beginning or end, thus without limit), and Bhaavasiddhi (state—infinite alternatives of knowledge, perception, etc., without limit) [2]. Siddhas are bodiless and devoid of physical and mental activities, unlike Arihantas who still possess a body [4]. In essence, Riddhi pertains to worldly or divine prosperity and powers, while Siddhi pertains to ultimate spiritual liberation and the state of the liberated soul.

Related questions

what is the difference between ananta and asamkhya?

In Jain philosophy, **asamkhya** (asankhyāta) and **ananta** are two distinct categories used to classify the number of pradeśas (indivisible constituent-units) that make up the six fundamental substances (dravyas) [1]. **Asamkhya** means "innumerable" or "countless" — a number so vast it cannot be counted, yet it is still finite and less than ananta. **Ananta** means "infinite" or "endless," representing a higher order of magnitude beyond asamkhya [1]. The Tattvārtha Sūtra specifies the number of pradeśas for each substance: dharma and adharma each have asamkhya pradeśas, a single jīva (soul) also has asamkhya pradeśas, while ākāśa (space) has ananta pradeśas [1]. Pudgala (matter) is unique in that its aggregates can have sankhyāta (countable), asamkhya, ananta, or even anantānanta (infinite-infinite) pradeśas, depending on the particular aggregate [1][3]. The key distinction is that asamkhya is a finite but uncountable number, whereas ananta is truly infinite — with anantānanta representing an even higher level of infinity [3].

Samvatsari meaning in hindi

संवत्सरी (Samvatsari) का हिंदी अर्थ है "वर्ष का अंतिम दिन" या "संवत्सर" (वर्ष) से संबंधित पर्व। यह जैन धर्म का एक महत्वपूर्ण पर्व है, जो पर्युषण पर्व के अंतिम दिन मनाया जाता है। इस दिन जैन अनुयायी "मिच्छामि दुक्कड़म" कहकर एक-दूसरे से क्षमा मांगते हैं, क्योंकि यह क्षमा और मैत्री का दिन होता है। [2] के अनुसार, संवत्सरी का दिन जैन कैलेंडर (पंचांग) में भादरवा (भाद्रपद) शुक्ल पंचमी को मनाया जाता है, और यह तिथि विभिन्न जैन संप्रदायों (जैसे श्वेतांबर, दिगंबर, स्थानकवासी) में अलग-अलग हो सकती है। [3] संदर्भ में यह भी बताया गया है कि संवत्सरी का संबंध "संवत्सर" (वर्ष) से है, और जैन आगम साहित्य में पाँच प्रकार के संवत्सर बताए गए हैं—नक्षत्र, चंद्र, कर्म (ऋतु), आदित्य और अभिवर्धित संवत्सर। [1] हालांकि, सामान्य बोलचाल में "संवत्सरी" का अर्थ विशेष रूप से क्षमापना पर्व से है, जब जैन लोग वर्ष भर की गलतियों के लिए क्षमा मांगते हैं और सभी प्राणियों से क्षमा याचना करते हैं। यह पर्व आत्मशुद्धि और अहिंसा के सिद्धांतों पर केंद्रित होता है।

can we see the devas

Yes, the devas (gods) can be seen, and Jain scriptures describe their clairvoyant perception (avadhi-jnana) in detail, which also implies their visibility to beings with the appropriate perceptual abilities. The range of what devas can see depends on their celestial abode: gods in the Saudharma and Īśāna heavens see up to the first hellish ground, those in Sanatkumāra and Mahendra see up to the second, Brahma and Lāntaka gods up to the third, and Śukra and Sahasrāra gods up to the fourth [1]. Gods in Āṇata, Parāṇata, Araṇa, and Acyuta heavens see up to the fifth hellish ground, the Graiveyaka gods up to the sixth or seventh, and the gods of the five Anuttaravimānas can see the entire universe downwards [1][2]. Additionally, the devas themselves are visible to humans under certain conditions. The context notes that hellish creatures, gods, and Tīrthaṅkaras have clairvoyant perception from birth and can see wholly, while others who acquire it through spiritual efforts see only partially [1]. In general Jain belief, devas possess luminous, transformable bodies and can appear to humans, particularly to those with spiritual attainments or during auspicious events like the pañcakalyāṇaka celebrations of a Tīrthaṅkara [3]. However, ordinary humans typically cannot see them without such special perceptual abilities or divine intervention.

who wrote vritti on dashvaikalik?

The Dashvaikalik Sutra (Dasavealiyam) is one of the mula sutras of the Svetambara Jains, written by Aryya Sayyambhava, who was fifth in line from Sramana Bhagavan Mahavira, around 429 B.C. [1] The text was composed to help in the spiritual progress of his son, who was destined to die within six months after initiation. [1] Regarding the vritti (commentary) on the Dashvaikalik Sutra, the knowledge base mentions that in the "Savruttik Aagam Sootraani" series, there is a "Dashvaikalik Mool evam Vrutti" (Dashvaikalik Mool and Vritti) published by Vardhaman Jain Agam Mandir Samstha, Palitana in 2017, but the specific author of that vritti is not named in the provided context. [4] Additionally, the context notes that there are two ancient churnis (explanatory works) on the Dashvaikalik Sutra: one by Agastya Simha Sthavir (probable period 3rd or 6th century Vikram) and another by Jindas Mahattar (7th century Vikram). [2] These are the earliest known commentaries, though the specific authorship of a "vritti" as such is not explicitly attributed in the sources provided.

who wrote bhashya on dashvaikalik?

The Dashavaikalik Sutra itself was written by **Arya Shayyambhav** (also spelled Shayyambhava), a Shrut Kevali who became the head of the Jain order in 395 B.V./452 B.C., and he composed it for his son Manak [Source 3]. Regarding commentaries (bhashya) on the Dashavaikalik Sutra, the context mentions several key works: - **Niryukti** — credited to Bhadrabahu II, written during the 5th–6th century of the Vikram era [Source 2] - **Teeka** — written by Acharya Haribhadra Suri during the 8th century of the Vikram era [Source 2] - **Deepika** — written by Samayasundar Gani during the 16th century of the Vikram era [Source 2] - **Churnis** (commentary works) — one by Agastya Simha Sthavir (probable period 3rd or 6th century Vikram) and another by Jindas Mahattar (7th century Vikram) [Source 4] - **Atma-Jnana-Prakashika Teeka** — a Hindi commentary by Acharyashri Atmaram ji M., published in 2003 Vikram/1946 A.D. [Source 4]

Can I use parchment paper for cooking fasting food during daslakshan

The knowledge base does not specifically address the use of parchment paper for cooking fasting food during Das Lakshana Parva. However, it does provide general guidelines about fasting and food preparation during this period. During Das Lakshana Parva (the Digambar 10-day festival), fasting typically involves complete abstinence from food or drink, though boiled water is permissible during the daytime [1][4]. For those who cannot fast fully, eating only one meal counts as limited fasting [1][4]. The scriptures emphasize avoiding harm to living beings, including earth-bodied, fire-bodied, air-bodied, plant-bodied, and mobile-bodied beings [3]. Food preparation rules for ascetics prohibit accepting food from pots sealed with clay, shellac, cloth, iron, wood, or other materials, as opening such seals may harm living beings [3]. Additionally, food mixed with flowers, seeds, or other vegetables is considered improper for ascetics [5]. In general, for laypeople preparing fasting food during Das Lakshana, using parchment paper would be a practical concern about avoiding harm to living beings and maintaining purity of food. Since parchment paper is a processed, non-living material, it would generally be acceptable for cooking, provided the food itself is prepared without violating Jain principles of non-violence (e.g., avoiding root vegetables, ensuring food is not cooked specifically for you if you are an ascetic). However, the specific use of parchment paper is not addressed in the provided sources, so you may wish to consult your local Jain spiritual teacher (Sadhu/Sadhvi) for guidance on this practical matter.