Can I use parchment paper for cooking fasting food during daslakshan
The knowledge base does not specifically address the use of parchment paper for cooking fasting food during Das Lakshana Parva. However, it does provide general guidelines about fasting and food preparation during this period.
During Das Lakshana Parva (the Digambar 10-day festival), fasting typically involves complete abstinence from food or drink, though boiled water is permissible during the daytime [1][4]. For those who cannot fast fully, eating only one meal counts as limited fasting [1][4]. The scriptures emphasize avoiding harm to living beings, including earth-bodied, fire-bodied, air-bodied, plant-bodied, and mobile-bodied beings [3]. Food preparation rules for ascetics prohibit accepting food from pots sealed with clay, shellac, cloth, iron, wood, or other materials, as opening such seals may harm living beings [3]. Additionally, food mixed with flowers, seeds, or other vegetables is considered improper for ascetics [5].
In general, for laypeople preparing fasting food during Das Lakshana, using parchment paper would be a practical concern about avoiding harm to living beings and maintaining purity of food. Since parchment paper is a processed, non-living material, it would generally be acceptable for cooking, provided the food itself is prepared without violating Jain principles of non-violence (e.g., avoiding root vegetables, ensuring food is not cooked specifically for you if you are an ascetic). However, the specific use of parchment paper is not addressed in the provided sources, so you may wish to consult your local Jain spiritual teacher (Sadhu/Sadhvi) for guidance on this practical matter.
Sources
Related questions
Based on the Jain principle of *Ahimsā* (non-violence), traditional silk is not considered acceptable because its production involves killing silkworm pupas. To produce just 100 grams of silk yarn, approximately 1,500 pupas are killed, typically by boiling the cocoons in water or exposing them to heat [1][4]. This violence makes silk a "ghora himsajanya" (extremely violent) fabric, which is not suitable for a non-violent ascetic [5]. The scriptures classify silk as a *vikalendriya* (two to four sensed beings) origin cloth, which is discouraged for monks, who are instead advised to use low-cost cotton or woolen clothes [2][5]. However, there is an exception: **Tusser silk** (also spelled Tussar), a type of silk for which the silkworms are not killed [2]. Additionally, non-violent alternatives include *Ahimsa silk* (where moths are allowed to emerge before the cocoon is used), artificial silk (art silk) like rayon (vegetable origin), and synthetic fabrics like nylon and polyester (petroleum products) [3]. So while conventional silk is avoided due to the violence involved, peaceful alternatives exist for those who wish to follow Jain principles.
Based on the Jain scriptures in the provided context, we should not eat food that grows underground because such foods are classified as **Anantkaya** (aggregate plant life), which contains innumerable living beings (jivas) [1]. The context lists 32 such forbidden foods, including tubers (Bhumikand), carrots, garlic, ginger, turmeric, radish, yams, and sprouted pulses [1]. These are considered "one-sensed" beings with infinite lives in a single body, and consuming them destroys countless souls [1]. The scriptures state that we are not endowed with the sense of taste to kill these innumerable living beings, and doing so for taste will result in losing the organ of taste in the next birth [1]. Additionally, the Acharanga Sutra explains that food placed on earth-bodied beings (sachit earth) is considered faulty and unacceptable, as it involves harm to earth-bodied beings [2]. By abstaining from eating these underground foods, one gains the merit (punya) of saving the lives of infinite living beings [1].
Your inspiration from Bhagwan Mahavir's story is well-founded. While in his mother Queen Trishala's womb, Mahavir remained completely motionless out of compassion, to avoid causing her any pain. However, this stillness made his mother deeply anxious, fearing something was wrong with her baby [2][3]. Realizing that even this brief stillness caused his parents such grief, he reflected that renouncing the world during their lifetime would surely break their hearts [3]. Therefore, he decided he would not take Diksha (initiation) until after his parents had passed away, so they would not suffer worry or sorrow on his account [3][4]. This decision reflects his profound compassion and sense of obligation to his parents. The context also shows that this principle of seeking parental permission was standard practice; for instance, Lord Mahavir told the young Aimutta that Diksha could not be given without his parents' consent, and Megh Kumar similarly sought his parents' blessing before initiation [1][5]. So Mahavir's choice was not just a personal one but a model of respect and care for family, even while on the spiritual path.
संवत्सरी (Samvatsari) का हिंदी अर्थ है "वर्ष का अंतिम दिन" या "संवत्सर" (वर्ष) से संबंधित पर्व। यह जैन धर्म का एक महत्वपूर्ण पर्व है, जो पर्युषण पर्व के अंतिम दिन मनाया जाता है। इस दिन जैन अनुयायी "मिच्छामि दुक्कड़म" कहकर एक-दूसरे से क्षमा मांगते हैं, क्योंकि यह क्षमा और मैत्री का दिन होता है। [2] के अनुसार, संवत्सरी का दिन जैन कैलेंडर (पंचांग) में भादरवा (भाद्रपद) शुक्ल पंचमी को मनाया जाता है, और यह तिथि विभिन्न जैन संप्रदायों (जैसे श्वेतांबर, दिगंबर, स्थानकवासी) में अलग-अलग हो सकती है। [3] संदर्भ में यह भी बताया गया है कि संवत्सरी का संबंध "संवत्सर" (वर्ष) से है, और जैन आगम साहित्य में पाँच प्रकार के संवत्सर बताए गए हैं—नक्षत्र, चंद्र, कर्म (ऋतु), आदित्य और अभिवर्धित संवत्सर। [1] हालांकि, सामान्य बोलचाल में "संवत्सरी" का अर्थ विशेष रूप से क्षमापना पर्व से है, जब जैन लोग वर्ष भर की गलतियों के लिए क्षमा मांगते हैं और सभी प्राणियों से क्षमा याचना करते हैं। यह पर्व आत्मशुद्धि और अहिंसा के सिद्धांतों पर केंद्रित होता है।
Yes, the devas (gods) can be seen, and Jain scriptures describe their clairvoyant perception (avadhi-jnana) in detail, which also implies their visibility to beings with the appropriate perceptual abilities. The range of what devas can see depends on their celestial abode: gods in the Saudharma and Īśāna heavens see up to the first hellish ground, those in Sanatkumāra and Mahendra see up to the second, Brahma and Lāntaka gods up to the third, and Śukra and Sahasrāra gods up to the fourth [1]. Gods in Āṇata, Parāṇata, Araṇa, and Acyuta heavens see up to the fifth hellish ground, the Graiveyaka gods up to the sixth or seventh, and the gods of the five Anuttaravimānas can see the entire universe downwards [1][2]. Additionally, the devas themselves are visible to humans under certain conditions. The context notes that hellish creatures, gods, and Tīrthaṅkaras have clairvoyant perception from birth and can see wholly, while others who acquire it through spiritual efforts see only partially [1]. In general Jain belief, devas possess luminous, transformable bodies and can appear to humans, particularly to those with spiritual attainments or during auspicious events like the pañcakalyāṇaka celebrations of a Tīrthaṅkara [3]. However, ordinary humans typically cannot see them without such special perceptual abilities or divine intervention.
The Dashvaikalik Sutra (Dasavealiyam) is one of the mula sutras of the Svetambara Jains, written by Aryya Sayyambhava, who was fifth in line from Sramana Bhagavan Mahavira, around 429 B.C. [1] The text was composed to help in the spiritual progress of his son, who was destined to die within six months after initiation. [1] Regarding the vritti (commentary) on the Dashvaikalik Sutra, the knowledge base mentions that in the "Savruttik Aagam Sootraani" series, there is a "Dashvaikalik Mool evam Vrutti" (Dashvaikalik Mool and Vritti) published by Vardhaman Jain Agam Mandir Samstha, Palitana in 2017, but the specific author of that vritti is not named in the provided context. [4] Additionally, the context notes that there are two ancient churnis (explanatory works) on the Dashvaikalik Sutra: one by Agastya Simha Sthavir (probable period 3rd or 6th century Vikram) and another by Jindas Mahattar (7th century Vikram). [2] These are the earliest known commentaries, though the specific authorship of a "vritti" as such is not explicitly attributed in the sources provided.