Why don't people get jati smaran often?

Not everyone gets *jāti smaraṇ* (past-life memory) because it is not an automatic or universal ability — it arises only under specific conditions related to karma and spiritual effort. According to the Āchārāṅga Sūtra, the main causes include: (1) suppression of *mohaniya karma* (deluding karma), as with Nami Rājarishi; (2) purification of attitude, feeling, and *leśyā* (the soul's purity color-code), as with Mrigaputra; and (3) listening to discourses of or having dialogue with beings of direct knowledge like Tīrthaṅkaras, Kevalis, or advanced sages (e.g., *avadhi-jñāni*, *manah-paryavajñāni*, *chaturdash pūrvadhār*). Some acquire it through outside influence, others naturally through *kṣayopasham* (extinction-cum-suppression) of karmas that obstruct that knowledge [1]. Additionally, the Rājpraśnīya Sūtra explains that many people miss the opportunity to hear the omniscient-propagated dharma — a key trigger for such awareness — due to four reasons: not approaching ascetics, not honoring them, not offering alms with devotion, and hiding from them when met on the way [2]. So, jāti smaraṇ depends on both karmic readiness and actively seeking spiritual guidance; those who lack the right karmic state or fail to engage with enlightened teachers do not develop it.

In Jainism, the disposal of human waste, including urination and excretion, is governed by the **Utsarga or Pärishthäpanikä Samiti** (meticulosity pertaining to disposal of wastes) [1]. This rule is primarily for monks and nuns, who are instructed to dispose of their waste in a lonely place that is not inhabited by living beings, to avoid causing any violence or harm to the minute creatures that may be present [1]. Jainism forbade the use of latrines and urinals by the monastic order because these places are breeding grounds for germs and insects; ascetics are advised to stay outside the city so their waste can be disposed of properly [1]. The core principle is that even the disposal of waste must be done with utmost care and vigilance (Upayoga) to ensure it does not cause violence, hurt, or inconvenience to any living being [1]. For lay Jains (householders), the same principle of non-violence applies, though they are not bound by the strict monastic rules. In general, they are expected to use toilets and dispose of waste in a manner that minimizes harm to living beings, following the broader Jain ethical framework of Ahimsä (non-violence) in all activities. The strict rules about using lonely, uninhabited places and avoiding latrines are specific to the ascetic order, as they have renounced worldly life and must take every possible precaution to avoid even minute violence [1].

Based on the provided context, the question of whether Jains can have milk is a matter of significant debate within the community, with a strong modern movement against it. The core issue is that while milk is not explicitly forbidden in ancient Jain scriptures, the modern dairy industry involves cruelty to cows, which are five-sensed (Panchendriya) animals. Cruelty to such animals is considered the highest sin in Jainism, and the sources argue that the cruelty in milk production is worse than in meat production, as dairy cows are tortured, their male calves are killed, and they are slaughtered after only 4-5 years of their natural 15-20 year life [1][5]. The context strongly advocates for Jains to avoid dairy products, especially in temple rituals, suggesting substitutes like water, almond milk, or soya milk [3][4]. It notes that while both Shvetämbar and Digambar sects traditionally use milk in rituals, no scriptures support this, and it may have been acceptable in the past when cows were treated as family and only leftover milk was consumed [3][5]. The sources highlight that about 10-15% of Jain youth in America are vegans, while less than 0.5% of adults are, indicating a generational shift in understanding the cruelty involved [1][4]. Ultimately, the decision is left to individual reflection, but the context clearly presents a strong case that consuming dairy in today's environment violates the Jain principle of Ahimsa (non-violence) [4].

According to Jain scriptures, nine specific individuals are destined to become Tirthankars in the coming (next) Utsarpini cycle of time. These are: (1) Krishna Vasudeva, (2) Baladeva Rama, (3) Udak Pedhalaputra, (4) Pottila, (5) Grihapati Shatak, (6) Nirgranth Daruk, (7) Nirgranthiputra Satyaki, (8) Shravika Ammad (or Buddhamma) Parivrajak, and (9) Arya Suparshva [1]. These nine souls will propagate the four-limbed religion (Chaturyam Dharma) in that future progressive half-cycle and will attain liberation (Siddha, Buddha, Mukta) [1]. The Trishashti Shalaka Purusha Caritra provides a more detailed list of the 24 future Tirthankars, mapping the souls of specific contemporary figures to their future roles. For example, Shrenika's soul will become the first future Tirthankar, Padmanabha; Suparshva's soul will become Suradeva; Pottila's soul will become Suparshva; and Dridhayu's soul will become Svayamprabhu [4]. The list continues through all 24, including souls such as Satyaki (becoming Suvrata), Baladeva (becoming Nishkashaya), Sulasa (becoming Nirmama), and Revati (becoming Citragupta), culminating with Svati's soul becoming the 24th Tirthankar, Bhadrakrit [4]. Additionally, the story of Marichi, the son of King Bharata, is notable: he is told he will be the first Vasudeva, a Chakrabhrit, and ultimately the 24th Arhat (Mahavira) in the future cycle [3].

Your inspiration from Bhagwan Mahavir's story is well-founded. While in his mother Queen Trishala's womb, Mahavir remained completely motionless out of compassion, to avoid causing her any pain. However, this stillness made his mother deeply anxious, fearing something was wrong with her baby [2][3]. Realizing that even this brief stillness caused his parents such grief, he reflected that renouncing the world during their lifetime would surely break their hearts [3]. Therefore, he decided he would not take Diksha (initiation) until after his parents had passed away, so they would not suffer worry or sorrow on his account [3][4]. This decision reflects his profound compassion and sense of obligation to his parents. The context also shows that this principle of seeking parental permission was standard practice; for instance, Lord Mahavir told the young Aimutta that Diksha could not be given without his parents' consent, and Megh Kumar similarly sought his parents' blessing before initiation [1][5]. So Mahavir's choice was not just a personal one but a model of respect and care for family, even while on the spiritual path.

I hear you — feeling left out despite trying your best to be a good friend is exhausting and painful. The knowledge base offers some helpful perspectives on friendship and feeling accepted. One key idea from the context is that **"to have a friend, you have to be a friend"** [2]. This means treating others the way you want to be treated — being generous, not always insisting on your own way, and avoiding selfishness. The skit in the source shows that someone who always goes first, takes the biggest cookie, or acts like they're the smartest pushes friends away, and that kindness is what actually leads to lasting friendship [2]. Additionally, the college guide emphasizes that **your sense of self should come from within, not from others' approval** [4]. If people don't respect and like you for who you are, they may not be the right crowd for you — you deserve to feel accepted by those around you [4]. It also advises trusting people gradually, getting to know their personalities and intentions before trusting them completely, and going with your gut feeling when unsure [5]. It's also perfectly okay to embrace your introverted side and make time for yourself — you don't have to be extremely social if that's not what you need [5]. In general, feeling left out can sometimes mean the group isn't the right fit, not that you're failing as a friend. It may help to reflect on whether your efforts are being reciprocated, communicate openly with your friends about how you feel, and also invest in yourself and your own interests so your sense of worth isn't tied to any one group.