How good is it to feed birds?
Based on the provided context, feeding birds is not directly discussed. The sources focus on Jain principles of non-violence (ahimsa) and the ethics of food, particularly condemning the consumption of animal products like meat, eggs, and dairy due to the cruelty involved in their production.
However, the context does offer a relevant principle: the Jain emphasis on compassion for all living beings. From this perspective, feeding birds would be considered a positive and compassionate act, as it aligns with the core value of non-violence and kindness towards all creatures. The sources highlight the importance of avoiding harm to animals and show deep concern for their welfare, which would extend to caring for birds by providing them food.
Sources
- $JES_921G_Karunano_Srot_Acharma_Ahimsa_Reference_Book_000223 · p.37 ↗
- Trishasti_Shalaka_Purusa_Caritra_Part_3_001003 · p.197 ↗
- sthananga_sutra_part_2_002906 · p.19 ↗
- $JES_921_Book_of_Compassion_Reverence_For_All_Life_Reference_Book_000221 · p.29 ↗
- $JES_921_Book_of_Compassion_Reverence_For_All_Life_Reference_Book_000221 · p.17 ↗
Related questions
Based on the provided context, the knowledge base does not explicitly state whether animals and birds reside in Nandishvar Dveep. The sources primarily describe the geography, mountains, lakes, and shrines of the continent, mentioning it as a divine realm with Ratikar mountains, Anjanak mountains, and lotus-lakes, which are described as homes of gods and sites for their festivals [3][4]. However, the context does mention that the Dadhimukh and Ratikar mountains contain eternal shrines of the Arhats, and the area is described as divine and attractive [3][4]. Additionally, a separate source lists many types of birds and animals in general, but it does not specifically connect them to Nandishvar Dveep [5]. Therefore, while the texts describe the region's features, they do not provide direct information about the presence of animals and birds there.
I hear you — feeling left out despite trying your best to be a good friend is exhausting and painful. The knowledge base offers some helpful perspectives on friendship and feeling accepted. One key idea from the context is that **"to have a friend, you have to be a friend"** [2]. This means treating others the way you want to be treated — being generous, not always insisting on your own way, and avoiding selfishness. The skit in the source shows that someone who always goes first, takes the biggest cookie, or acts like they're the smartest pushes friends away, and that kindness is what actually leads to lasting friendship [2]. Additionally, the college guide emphasizes that **your sense of self should come from within, not from others' approval** [4]. If people don't respect and like you for who you are, they may not be the right crowd for you — you deserve to feel accepted by those around you [4]. It also advises trusting people gradually, getting to know their personalities and intentions before trusting them completely, and going with your gut feeling when unsure [5]. It's also perfectly okay to embrace your introverted side and make time for yourself — you don't have to be extremely social if that's not what you need [5]. In general, feeling left out can sometimes mean the group isn't the right fit, not that you're failing as a friend. It may help to reflect on whether your efforts are being reciprocated, communicate openly with your friends about how you feel, and also invest in yourself and your own interests so your sense of worth isn't tied to any one group.
संवत्सरी (Samvatsari) का हिंदी अर्थ है "वर्ष का अंतिम दिन" या "संवत्सर" (वर्ष) से संबंधित पर्व। यह जैन धर्म का एक महत्वपूर्ण पर्व है, जो पर्युषण पर्व के अंतिम दिन मनाया जाता है। इस दिन जैन अनुयायी "मिच्छामि दुक्कड़म" कहकर एक-दूसरे से क्षमा मांगते हैं, क्योंकि यह क्षमा और मैत्री का दिन होता है। [2] के अनुसार, संवत्सरी का दिन जैन कैलेंडर (पंचांग) में भादरवा (भाद्रपद) शुक्ल पंचमी को मनाया जाता है, और यह तिथि विभिन्न जैन संप्रदायों (जैसे श्वेतांबर, दिगंबर, स्थानकवासी) में अलग-अलग हो सकती है। [3] संदर्भ में यह भी बताया गया है कि संवत्सरी का संबंध "संवत्सर" (वर्ष) से है, और जैन आगम साहित्य में पाँच प्रकार के संवत्सर बताए गए हैं—नक्षत्र, चंद्र, कर्म (ऋतु), आदित्य और अभिवर्धित संवत्सर। [1] हालांकि, सामान्य बोलचाल में "संवत्सरी" का अर्थ विशेष रूप से क्षमापना पर्व से है, जब जैन लोग वर्ष भर की गलतियों के लिए क्षमा मांगते हैं और सभी प्राणियों से क्षमा याचना करते हैं। यह पर्व आत्मशुद्धि और अहिंसा के सिद्धांतों पर केंद्रित होता है।
Yes, the devas (gods) can be seen, and Jain scriptures describe their clairvoyant perception (avadhi-jnana) in detail, which also implies their visibility to beings with the appropriate perceptual abilities. The range of what devas can see depends on their celestial abode: gods in the Saudharma and Īśāna heavens see up to the first hellish ground, those in Sanatkumāra and Mahendra see up to the second, Brahma and Lāntaka gods up to the third, and Śukra and Sahasrāra gods up to the fourth [1]. Gods in Āṇata, Parāṇata, Araṇa, and Acyuta heavens see up to the fifth hellish ground, the Graiveyaka gods up to the sixth or seventh, and the gods of the five Anuttaravimānas can see the entire universe downwards [1][2]. Additionally, the devas themselves are visible to humans under certain conditions. The context notes that hellish creatures, gods, and Tīrthaṅkaras have clairvoyant perception from birth and can see wholly, while others who acquire it through spiritual efforts see only partially [1]. In general Jain belief, devas possess luminous, transformable bodies and can appear to humans, particularly to those with spiritual attainments or during auspicious events like the pañcakalyāṇaka celebrations of a Tīrthaṅkara [3]. However, ordinary humans typically cannot see them without such special perceptual abilities or divine intervention.
The Dashvaikalik Sutra (Dasavealiyam) is one of the mula sutras of the Svetambara Jains, written by Aryya Sayyambhava, who was fifth in line from Sramana Bhagavan Mahavira, around 429 B.C. [1] The text was composed to help in the spiritual progress of his son, who was destined to die within six months after initiation. [1] Regarding the vritti (commentary) on the Dashvaikalik Sutra, the knowledge base mentions that in the "Savruttik Aagam Sootraani" series, there is a "Dashvaikalik Mool evam Vrutti" (Dashvaikalik Mool and Vritti) published by Vardhaman Jain Agam Mandir Samstha, Palitana in 2017, but the specific author of that vritti is not named in the provided context. [4] Additionally, the context notes that there are two ancient churnis (explanatory works) on the Dashvaikalik Sutra: one by Agastya Simha Sthavir (probable period 3rd or 6th century Vikram) and another by Jindas Mahattar (7th century Vikram). [2] These are the earliest known commentaries, though the specific authorship of a "vritti" as such is not explicitly attributed in the sources provided.
The Dashavaikalik Sutra itself was written by **Arya Shayyambhav** (also spelled Shayyambhava), a Shrut Kevali who became the head of the Jain order in 395 B.V./452 B.C., and he composed it for his son Manak [Source 3]. Regarding commentaries (bhashya) on the Dashavaikalik Sutra, the context mentions several key works: - **Niryukti** — credited to Bhadrabahu II, written during the 5th–6th century of the Vikram era [Source 2] - **Teeka** — written by Acharya Haribhadra Suri during the 8th century of the Vikram era [Source 2] - **Deepika** — written by Samayasundar Gani during the 16th century of the Vikram era [Source 2] - **Churnis** (commentary works) — one by Agastya Simha Sthavir (probable period 3rd or 6th century Vikram) and another by Jindas Mahattar (7th century Vikram) [Source 4] - **Atma-Jnana-Prakashika Teeka** — a Hindi commentary by Acharyashri Atmaram ji M., published in 2003 Vikram/1946 A.D. [Source 4]